Throughout the
two readings, there seem to be a period of contention regarding whether or not
blogs should be classified more as a genre or a medium. As of right now, I’m
straddling the fence between the two, but I hope by reasoning the content of
the readings aloud, it might get me closer to committing to one explanation or
another.
Jill Walker
Rettberg’s “Blogging” echoes my very indecisiveness. In one instance, blogs
“share similarities in layout and contain many of the same elements” (Rettberg,
19). These shared conventions, such as the use of dated entries, titles, and
‘about me’ pages, are commonly found when it comes to genres. For example,
Rettberg references the example of a sonnet (18). People who are familiar with
the genre know that sonnets are a form of poetry that contains fourteen lines,
and even that genre contains subgenres. There are Italian sonnets and English
sonnets, with the latter employing a specific rhyme scheme. However, Rettberg
also visits the other side of the argument and explains that labeling blogs as
a medium could be just as correct. In my own words, a medium is the channel in
which a message is communicated. Television is a medium. Books are a medium.
Sculpture is a medium.
Rettberg uses
the following example:
“Just as an
artist chooses to use oil pants rather than watercolour or a director chooses
to work with cinema rather than television or theatre, a blogger has chosen to
work within the set of constraints and affordances offered by blogging
software” (20).
There’s also a
deliberateness when choosing a medium because the rhetor should examine which
medium would be best used to showcase their desired genre. If a photographer
wanted to showcase their work, would a blogging platform be better than
designing their own website? Either way, Rhettberg subscribes to the reasoning
that it could be both depending on how you view blogs.
In Carolyn R.
Miller and Dawn Shepherd’s “Blogging as a Social Action: A Genre Analysis of
the Weblog,” there is no waffling between whether or not weblogs are a medium
or a genre. Like Rhettberg, they call upon the same conventions that comprise
the blog as identified as a genre. “These early blogs had three primary features:
they were chronologically organized, contained links to sites of interest on
the web, and provided commentary on the links” (5). Now, blogs have evolved to
incorporate a handful of other convention. Things like widgets can synch a
calendar with your blog and the ways in which you can link to other sites has
increased. It’s a genre that keeps adapting and, in my opinion, improving,
which is something that I find to be really interesting. When compared with
older genres, like sonnets, blogs possess a flexibility that is rarely seen
elsewhere.
While only one
of the readings makes a side-by-side comparison, I think that it really depends
on how a blog is being used or in what context it’s being explained in order to
really place a definitive label. When looking at options for a project with a
digital supplement, I may look at different mediums – Blogger, Prezi, Wix – to
convey my ideas or information. Depending on that information, a website might
be better than a blog. In this case, blogs are acting as a medium rather than a
genre. But, if I decided on using Blogger, I would then have to tackle what
sort of blog I wanted to make. Would it be educational? Satirical? These
questions cause my blog to function more as a genre.
I know it
sounds like a cop out to say that it’s both, but I honestly believe that the
answer depends on the context and usage of the term ‘blog.’
I also wanted
to examine the Berkenkotter and Huckin quote found in the Miller and Sheperd
reading.
“Genres are
the intellectual scaffolds on which community-based knowledge is constructed”
(1).
One thing that
blogs really excel at is creating the opportunity for discourse. “If you’re
interested in any particular topic, you can probably find a blog – or a dozen
blogs – about it. If not, you can easily start your own blog” (Rettberg, 18).
It’s also a genre that can become inadvertently for public consumption. In
Rettberg’s example of Dooce, the blogger, Heather B. Armstrong, started her
blog to vent and rant about her annoyances with work. I doubt she planned for
it to grow into one of the most popular personal blogs on the Internet,
according to Technorati.com (Rettberg, 9). A lot of personal blogs are created
to just let off some steam in a kind of digital catharsis. Other blogs, such as
those with a political theme, use current events to inspire their writing.
Sticking with the example of the political blog, there can be differences in
the way information is blogged or presented. One blogger may choose to just
cover the facts in a journalistic approach, while another may decide to
spotlight a political event to spark a discourse of activism.
The latter
subgenre makes use of Miller and Shepherd’s concept of kairos. “Kairos describes
both the sense in which discourse is understood as fitting and timely – the way
it observes propriety or decorum – and the way in which it can seize on the
unique opportunity of a fleeting moment to create new rhetorical possibility”
(Miller & Shepherd, 2). Bloggers, especially within the political sphere,
need to keep relevant. I think it’s more difficult to get an audience to care
about and “create a new rhetorical possibility” in regards to a political
problem that happened a decade ago, as opposed to one that is current and
accessible in a variety of news sources.
Truthfully, I
think these two readings have given me more to unpack rather than provide
answers to questions like genre v. medium. However, it has become clear that
blogs aren’t as simple as they seem. There are rhetorical choices for nearly
every aspect I can think of for choosing and using a blog. What platform should
I use? Am I going to be blogging for an audience or is this just for myself?
How should I arrange my content? After reading these analyses, I can easily say
that blogs are one of the most involved genres I’ve ever used. However, they’re
extremely forgiving and flexible, which I think is why it’s so widely utilized,
from disgruntled professionals blogging about their coworkers to techies that
want to stay on top of the latest industry advancements.
1 comments:
I identified with your struggle between defining blogs as a genre or a medium. I had never even considered blogging to be a textual genre until reading these articles myself. After reading both articles I had formed the personal opinion that blogging is its own genre. However, your interpretation of Rettburg’s text rekindles my hesitation to commit to one opinion. I keep going back and forth about what I perceive as medium and what I perceive as genre. I suppose I think of genre as the larger umbrella that medium fits under. I think of books as a genre communicating through the medium of text. Movies as a genre presented through the medium of film. But those could so easily be twisted and presented differently.
I also agreed with your opinion about the flexibility of blogs. They offer a much more multimodal experience than other genres or mediums of text. I’ve followed a variety of different blogs in the past and I’ve found that a blog that utilizes text and visual media is usually the most successful. Even most vloggers on YouTube no longer rely on simple video. They no incorporate links and text as well. We really can expand our thoughts using blogs in ways we can’t with other genres.
You tied Rettburg’s article back to Miller and Shepherd’s really well when discussing citizen journalism and kairos. Your point about the importance for bloggers in the public sphere to stay relevant rings especially true in our highly mediated society.
Thanks for the great interpretations and cool use of GIFs!
Post a Comment